Catalogs Versus Databases

Claire Nickerson

In chapter nine, you learned about library catalogs. If you ask a computer scientist, they will tell you that the library catalog is a type of database, because it stores data in a structured way. However, if you ask a librarian, they will tell you that a library catalog and a library database are two different things, although there is some overlap in how they function. Here’s a comparison:

Library Catalog Library Database
  • Tells you where to find items, either on a shelf or in a database. It provides the equivalent of a street address, but it doesn’t store the full text of an item.
  • Stores the full text of information sources such as articles or e-books, although it may also have short descriptions of articles without the full text (this is calledĀ indexing orĀ abstracting)
  • Is designed to list all of the resources a library has available
  • Is designed to list a subset of the resources a library has available, usually focusing on a specific subject (e.g. biology) or type of resource (e.g. newspaper articles)
  • Focuses mostly on books, periodicals (like magazines or journals), and physical items (although it may also contain individual articles)
  • Focuses mostly on individual articles (for example, from magazines or journals), although a specialized database may contain other types of items, like e-books or maps
  • Is managed by librarians entering or importing records
  • Is usually managed by a vendor that sells access to libraries, or sometimes by a governmental or non-profit organization
  • Is useful when you are searching for a specific item, when you want to search for books, when you have an interdisciplinary research question, or when your topic is very narrow and you have already struck out in discipline-specific databases
  • Is useful when you have a subject-specific research question and want to answer it using a selection of articles, not a book or one particular item you’re already aware of

Some academic libraries offer an omnibus search tool that searches both the records in the library catalog and records from many of their databases (although usually not all of them, since some database records may be incompatible with the omnibus search tool). However, if you are conducting academic research on a specific topic, a discipline-specific database is usually a better place to start, since you won’t have to comb through so many records that may not be related to your topic.

It can be hard to tell by looking whether a search tool is a catalog or a database, since both may use similar search interfaces. Here are some clues to look for:

  • Can you search directly from the library’s homepage? It’s probably a catalog or omnibus search tool. Do you have to click through several other pages to get to the search interface? It’s probably a database.
  • Is the library’s name in the top left corner? It’s probably a catalog. Does the top left corner say something else? It’s probably a database, although the top right corner may something like, “Access provided by [name of library]” if it’s something your library pays for access to.
  • When you search, do the results include physical items (such as printed books) and their call numbers? It’s definitely a catalog. Can you access the full, digital text of articles or e-books without going to another web address? It’s definitely a database.

In summary:

Catalog Database
Search directly from the library’s homepage

Library name in top left corner

Includes physical items

Click through several pages to get to the search interface

Vendor name in top left corner (library name may be somewhere else)

Contains full text of digital items

The rest of this chapter will discuss why library databases are useful, how to choose one, and how to search it.

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The Path to Information Literacy: From Finding a Topic to Writing an Annotated Bibliography Copyright © 2026 by Fort Hays State University Tebo Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Feedback/Errata

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *